Saturday, June 20, 2009

On the issue of Student Motivation


Teachers often ask the question: 'How to improve the motivation of my students?' There is a genuine concern expressed here. Teachers naturally know that the performance of their students hinges around the issue of motivation.

The Teacher as a Leader

A teacher's main responsibility is to lead the students to achieve greater performance. Thus we can say that an effective teacher is an effective leader, and teaching is leading. Thus leadership development becomes the central theme of faculty development.

Effective leaders are those who empower their followers and are empowered by the followers. In a way it is mutual empowerment. Power is not in the leader or in the followers, but in the mutual relationship.

The power of a good teacher is of a very special type. It is power that comes from his or her ability to influence the student, through expertise and genuine concern for the well-being and development of the student. The teacher leads by demanding and obtaining higher and higher performance from the students. Good teachers get the students to set stretch targets, and helps them to achieve them. The teacher offers himself or herself as the most important resource for the students to achieve their goals.


Understanding Motivation

Effective teachers are students of human motivation, and keep learning about it throughout their career, just as they spend time updating knowledge in their respective areas of specialization. A teacher learns the art of motivation when he raises his role to that of a leader, rather than being a mere conduit for knowledge transfer.

Among the various models used for understanding motivation, I find that the one given by David C. McClleland, developed during his tenure at Harvard, and elaborated in his book 'The Achieving Society' (1961) is highly relevant for educators, as well as leaders in every field.

McClelland's theory talks about three types of motivation: Achievement, Power and Affiliation. Which of these correlates strongly with academic performance? It is Achievement Motivation. So the question for the teacher becomes 'How can I nurture achievement motivation in my students?'

What is meant by Achievement Motivation? In essence, it is the motivation to excel. This can be expressed as the need to surpass standards, break records set by oneself or by others, do better than what one has done till now, do something unique, discover new ways of doing things, create something original and pursue a chosen goal with passion for a long time.

The Achievement Motivated individual sets clear goals, wherein he sees a reasonable possibility of success, and then stretches himself to accomplish the goals. He doesn't need certainty of success; rather he prefers to set goals where the likelihood of success and failure are fairly balanced, say 50-50. That is because he likes to take on challenges which are neither too easy nor extremely difficult for his skill level and resources.

The Achievement Motivated individual persists in the goal-directed behaviour, without easily giving up in the face of difficulties. Only if he has sufficient reason to believe that the goal is really unachievable, does he give up and refocus on a new goal that would satisfy his achievement need. He likes clear and frank feedbak, and uses measurement of the outcomes for obtaining feedback about how well he is doing.

Now, isn't that the kind of student that every teacher would like to teach? One who sets clear goals for academic success, and works hard to achieve them. One who takes feedback about performance, and tries to improve his performance from one test to the next.

The reality is that the vast majority of students in an average school or college are not achievement motivated. This does not mean that they have no motivation; it only means that their motivation is not related to the need for achievement. They are in fact motivated enough to do a lot of things, other than work on their academic areas. When a teacher talks about motivating his students, knowingly or unknowingly he is talking about arousing the achievement motivation in his or her students, and helping them to excel in their studies. How can the teacher do this successfully?

How to arouse Achievement Motivation?

Motivation comes from the same Latin root that is there in motion, movement, mobile etc. Motivation is that which makes someone or something move. For living beings, especially human beings, this motive force can come from within. We call this internal motive force as motivation.

Motivation produces goal-directed movement. Remember, there is a goal towards which the movement is happening. So the pre-requisite for motivation to be present is the presence of a goal. This would mean that if a teacher wants to motivate his or her student, one of the tasks would be to help the student to clarify his or her goal. And then help the student to stay focused on the goal, inspite of distractions that come on the way.

In my sessions with fresh engineering graduates, I help them to clarify their goals for a two year period. Before coming to goal-setting, I engage them in a number of activities that arouse achievement related thoughts and emotions in their minds. I help them to recollect their experiences of 'peak performance.' Invariably I have found that every person, even the one with average or below average academic record, has had some experience in which he or she set a goal and stretched to achieve that. An experience in which he or she worked with a clear goal and achieved that, or at least got close enough to success. Even failure would have been delightful because of the worthiness of the goal, and the confidence gained by stretching oneself beyond self-imposed limits.

In achivement motivation programmes of longer duration, I ask the participatns to write creative stories, first without inputs on achievement motivation, and thereafter following a systematic schema (achivement syndrome), which characterises achievement thinking. If there is enough time, I engage them in achievement related games and activities, which give them experiential feedback about their motivational profile, and bring to surface their latent achievement needs. One of the important components of the programme is the consistent use of achievement language, which arouses achievement imagery.


Teacher's Language Influences the Student's Motivation

As I mentioned earlier, the Teacher's role is that of a Leader. The teacher influences the student through his expertise and genuine concern for the student's performance.

The motivation of the teacher has a great impact on the motivation of the student. A motivated teacher not only kindles the spark of motivation in the student, but also keeps the fire burning. How does the teacher do this? There is only one resource available to the teacher to do this. And that resource is language. It is the language used by the teacher, including body language, that kindles or douses the spark of motivation in the students. It is not a matter of being technically right, but more a matter of how things are conveyed.

What is the language that arouses and sustains motivation in the learners? Good teachers, just like good leaders, somehow get it right. Mentioned below are some aspects of the language that motivates learners:

  1. Conveys respect for the learner as a person. No devaluing statements, either explicitly in words or implicitly through body language.
  2. Conveys positive expectations and the teacher's belief in the ability of the learner.
  3. Focuses on the learner's goals, with a continuous effort to clarify, and if required, recalibrate the goals based on performance.
  4. Acknowledges and appreciates improvement in the learner's performance as well as the efforts put in by the learner. Does not devalue the learner even if he or she fails.


What can Teachers Do?

What are the practical steps for the teacher to address the issue of student motivation? Here are some of them:

  1. Consistently use the language that arouses and sustains motivation, as discussed in the previous section.
  2. Highlight and recognize achievement, even small ones if a learner has stretched beyond his or her usual limit. Celebrate the success of the learners. Do not be stingy in praising the learners. This does not come naturally to many people, and a conscious effort needs to be made to overcome this culturally induced limitation on the part of the teacher's behaviour.
  3. Give clear feedback on a continuous basis. Negative feedback should start with an appreciation of something positive about the learner. Focus on behaviour rather than personality of the learner.
  4. Beware of the need for controlling power. Distinguish between controlling the process and controlling the person. Controlling the process (for example, submission of an assignment on time) is important for getting the desired results. Attempts to control the person will either lead to submission and dependency or aggression and disobedience.
  5. Most important, recognize that the teacher is the role model. When the teacher models achievement-oriented behaviour, the students tend to do follow the same behaviour. Model achievement by engaging in research, exploring the subject matter in depth, striving to be a better teacher year after year, learning from feedback and experimenting with innovative learning methodologies.
That's all for the timebeing. In a future blog, I plan to write about teaching as the process of co-designing and co-creation.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Collboration

I wrote about collaboration on my general blog a few days ago.  Here's the link:  http://jjosephnotes.blogspot.com/2009/04/reflections-on-designing-spaces-for.html

What would you say as the most important paradigm shift in pedagogy as we are preparing to move into the second decade of the twenty-first century?  Would it be the ubiquitous application of technology in learning? Would it be the application of new insights coming from the field of neurosciences?  Or a wider acceptance of constructivist philosophy and psychology in education? Or perhaps a universal adoption of problem-based learning approaches?  Or something else, that is going to be the defining characteristic of the new pedagogy?  I feel it is collaboration that will qualify as the candidate for this distinction.  

Collaboration will be the way of life and work in every sphere of human activity. At the work- place, family, education and even politics.  The only exception perhaps will be religion, which may remain as the last bastion of hierarchy and domination for a few more decades.

Monday, April 13, 2009

I am trying to find out the source of this adage: "Kids don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care."

By the way, it isn't only for kids; even adult learners learn better from teachers who really care for their students. Learning is not just an intellectual process, but an emotional process too.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Pedagogy - Presentation Slides

Here are the slides of my recent presentation on Pedagogy: Approaches for Facilitation of Learning.

Event: Dialogue Session on Competency Development - Sharing of International Best Practices
Organized by Faith InfoTech Academy for Professional Advancement
6th March, 2009
Technopark, Trivandrum, Kerala.















Thank you.

E-learning Presentation Slides

Here are the slides from my recent presentation on E-learning

Event: Dialogue Session on Competency Development - Sharing of International Best Practices
Organized by Faith InfoTech Academy for Professional Advancement
6th March, 2009
Technopark, Trivandrum, Kerala.













Thank you.

Monday, March 9, 2009


Sunday, March 8, 2009

Note on Pedagogy

Last week, I gave a presentation on pedagogy to a group of teachers from engineering colleges. I already wrote about my presentation on e-learning in the previous post. Here I am beginning to write about the highlights of my presentation on pedagogy.

I started with the problem. The issues are of student performance, teacher performance and job satisfaction. It is clearly stated by Richard M. Felder and Linda K. Silverman, in their classic paper titled "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education", published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 1988. The scenario is not very different even today. To quote Felder and Silverman:

"Mismatches exist between common learning styles of engineering students and traditional teaching styles of engineering professors. In consequence, students become bored and inattentive in class, do poorly on tests, get discouraged about the courses, the curriculum, and themselves, and in some cases change to other curricula or drop out of school. Professors, confronted by low test grades, unresponsive or hostile classes, poor attendance and dropouts, know something is not working; they may become overly critical of their students (making things even worse) or begin to wonder if they are in the right profession. Most seriously, society loses potentially excellent engineers."

<< http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf >>

To address the issues, we need better pedagogy. I think of pedagogy as the algorithm of education. Though there are many algorithms that work, we can increase effectiveness significantly with a better algorithm.

<< class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Andragogy' popularized by Malcolm Knowles is often used to refer specifically to adult learning. >>


The starting point for effective pedagogy is knowing the learner. Knowing the learner is different from merely knowing about the learner. The framework for knowing the learner would involve a few dimensions, such as the following:

  1. Intelligence: Not only logical-mathematical intelligence, but also the other types of intelligences as described by Howard Gardner.
  2. Learning Style: Use any model, such as Index of Learning Styles (Richard Felder and Linda Silverman) or Learning Style Inventory (David Kolb). If required, expand the profile by including profiles such as Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) or Hermann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI). << http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html >>
  3. Motivation: Again use any model of motivation. I prefer the model based on David C. McClelland's theories, and look specifically for achievement motivation.
  4. Goals: Try to get an understanding of the learner's overall life goals and specific career goals for the medium term. I get the participants in my sessions to recollect their experiences of peak performance, and commit themselves to valued career goals for a two year period.

I shall write about other aspects of pedagogy, such as Problem Based (Inductive) Learning, Iteration, Collaboration and Constructivism in other posts in the future.

Signing off for now. -- JJ